Growing from ₹10 Crore to ₹100 Crore changes everything: stakeholder scrutiny, cash volatility, and the gap between plans and reality. The pressure to forecast accurately, free up working capital, and give the board actionable options can be overwhelming. If this sounds familiar, you’re not alone — and it’s fixable with the right structure.
Summary: Apply a focused FP&A playbook to move decision-making from fire-fighting to forward control: align forecasts to operating levers, secure cash runway, speed reporting cycles, and turn finance into a growth partner that can support scale from ₹10 Crore to ₹100 Crore.
What’s really going on?
When a business targets 10x scale, finance often becomes the bottleneck: data is scattered, cadence is ad hoc, and leadership lacks confidence in numbers. The underlying problem is not spreadsheets — it’s the absence of a predictable, repeatable FP&A operating model that ties forecasts to actions.
- Symptoms: monthly forecasts that swing widely and are revised after the board meeting.
- Symptoms: frequent cash surprises despite “sufficient runway” on paper.
- Symptoms: finance spends more time producing reports than advising on trade-offs.
- Symptoms: decisions get delayed because scenarios are hard to produce quickly.
Where leaders go wrong
Common missteps are understandable — growth teams move fast and finance tries to keep up. But certain mistakes compound risk as you scale:
- Relying on top-down targets without linking them to customer, pricing, and delivery levers.
- Treating the budget as a static document rather than a living steering tool.
- Over-investing in tooling before fixing data discipline and cadences.
- Under-communicating cash assumptions to the CEO and board — leading to expensive surprises.
Cost of waiting: Every quarter you delay a repeatable FP&A process, you risk financing under optimized terms, missed growth opportunities, and longer time to profitability.
A better FP&A approach — FP&A playbook
Instead of incremental fixes, adopt a compact playbook that converts numbers into decisions. Here’s a simple 4-step framework used for mid-market B2B and SaaS leaders we advise:
- 1. Anchor: one-source-of-truth plan. What: consolidate revenue, costs, cash and headcount into a single model. Why: removes versioning and clarifies trade-offs. How to start: map three critical drivers (pricing, win-rate, delivery time) and build a bottom-up monthly model for 12–18 months.
- 2. Scenario lanes: best, base, downside. What: produce three tested scenarios with trigger points. Why: boards prefer options paired with actions. How to start: define triggers (e.g., MRR decline >5% month-over-month) and one tactical response per trigger.
- 3. Cash-first forecasting. What: run a rolling 13-week cash forecast linked to operating plan. Why: cash wins when growth is capital-constrained. How to start: reconcile bank balances weekly and model receivables, payables, and planned capex.
- 4. Operating cadence: decision-ready reporting. What: replace long decks with a 1-page executive pack and a 60-minute monthly review. Why: faster decisions, less rework. How to start: limit reports to KPI deltas, root-cause, and recommended actions.
Light proof: a mid-market SaaS client we advised used this playbook and shortened decision cycles; within two quarters they improved forecast stability and renegotiated a working capital facility with more favorable terms.
If you’d like a 20-minute walkthrough of how this could look for your business, talk to the Finstory team.
Quick implementation checklist — FP&A playbook
- Inventory current data sources and owners (CRM, ERP, bank, payroll) — assign single owners.
- Build a consolidated monthly driver model for revenue and a linked P&L.
- Stand up a rolling 13-week cash forecast and update weekly.
- Define 3 scenario lanes and 3 operational triggers with responses.
- Create a 1-page executive pack template (variance, burn, KPIs, asks).
- Set a monthly review rhythm with clear decision owners and SLAs.
- Reduce manual reconciliations: automate two time-consuming reconciliations first.
- Train one business partner per function on the model and the cadence.
- Agree on two near-term board asks and prepare one scenario playbook for each.
What success looks like
Outcomes should be measurable and visible to leadership:
- Forecast accuracy improves — variance to actuals narrows to within single-digit percent month-over-month for key revenue streams.
- Shorter cycle times — month-end close and board pack prep cut by 30–50%.
- Faster decisions — the monthly finance review produces at least two specific operational actions with owners.
- Stronger cash visibility — a rolling 13-week forecast that reliably predicts cash headroom and reduces emergency draws on credit.
- Board confidence — fewer follow-up data requests and more strategic conversations on investment choices.
Risks & how to manage them
- Data quality: Risk — inconsistent source data creates noise. Mitigation — start with the highest-impact reconciliations and enforce owner accountability; use simple validation rules.
- Adoption: Risk — teams ignore the new cadence. Mitigation — make the monthly pack useful: include actionable items and limit the required time commitment for business leads.
- Bandwidth: Risk — finance is too busy to build the model. Mitigation — prioritize a minimum viable model and consider a short-term external FP&A partner to fast-track the build and knowledge transfer.
Tools, data, and operating rhythm
Tools matter, but only in service of the operating rhythm. Typical toolset components: a driver-based planning model (spreadsheet or planning tool), a BI dashboard for KPI and cohort analysis, and a simple cash tracker. The priority is cadence: weekly cash reviews, monthly operational reviews, and quarterly strategy refreshes.
We’ve seen teams cut fire-drill reporting by half once the right cadence is in place — the same data, delivered with fewer interruptions and clearer decisions.
FAQs
- Q: How long to implement? A: A pragmatic MVP can be delivered in 6–8 weeks; a complete set of dashboards and full handover in 3–4 months depending on complexity.
- Q: Internal team or external help? A: Both — internal ownership is critical, but an external partner accelerates setup and brings best-practice templates and governance.
- Q: How much effort monthly? A: After implementation, expect a steady-state cadence of 8–16 hours/month from finance and 2–4 hours from each business lead for review and inputs.
- Q: Will this reduce uncertainty? A: It won’t eliminate uncertainty, but it will convert surprises into planned scenarios and clear response actions.
Next steps
If you’re a CFO or head of finance ready to move from reactive reporting to proactive steering, start with a short diagnostic: a 60-minute review of your current model, cash cadence, and reporting pack. The FP&A playbook we described is practical and prioritizes cash and decision speed — not more dashboards. The improvements from one quarter of better FP&A can compound for years; if you want focused, measurable change this year, take the next step now.
Work with Finstory. If you want this done right—tailored to your operations—we’ll map the process, stand up the dashboards, and train your team. Let’s talk about your goals.
📞 Ready to take the next step?
Book a 20-min call with our experts and see how we can help your team move faster.
Prefer email or phone? Write to info@finstory.net
or call +91 7907387457.

